More right-wing derpitation!
1. Some things are worse than a puppet!
Lindaman posted this picture:
Then Lindaman says: "Just sayin'..."
Too bad he's not grouchy, Lindaman. lol
Here's one for you:
Just sayin'... After all, Bush did blow up frogs with firecrackers as a child.
2. Boston Marathon / Zimmerman... plus a Gosnell bonus!
Lindaman says: "Right now, the Boston Marathon bombing is on people's minds, including people who are hoping, yes HOPING, it's a white guy who did it. REALLY? We have people dying, missing limbs, and in critical condition, and all some people can think is "Hope it's a white guy this time"?
Listen, I get how desperate some people are to point fingers (an odd thing to do considering kids are being suspended for pointing their fingers to look like a gun after Sandy Hook) at whatever group is being hated this week. Then, invariably, the world finds out the person or group responsible...isn't. Remember George Zimmerman being called a white man accused of shooting Trayvon Martin? Yeah. The media got that one wrong. Several times.
The police report said Zimmerman was white. Funny how you keep ducking that fact.
Hispanic is Zimmerman's ethnicity. Ethnicity is not a race. His race is white.
So, as a white man,
Nooooo, really? I never would have guessed from your right-wing racists posts over the years, that you were white.
let me say this. I'm not your damn scapegoat for all that's wrong in the world. If your life's messed up, don't blame me. And don't assume that somehow I got breaks nobody else did because of my skin color. I worked for what I have, and I will keep on working until the day I retire or die. (Naturally, I'm hoping for the former.)
Of course, some will jump on this post and accuse me of being a white supremacist assbag. Guess what? I don't care. I stopped seeing skin color a LONG time ago and treat people the way I would want to be treated. You know, like Dr. King wanted us to do?
And yet again, white right-wing assbags speak for Dr. King.
Ever notice that racists always claim they aren't racist? lol
But here's where I draw the line. I will not be made a victim of slander just so some people can justify their own hatred of people like me. If I did something to wrong you, come to me like an adult. If you don't know me, don't accuse me of crap because a white man did something bad.
Sorry, Lindaman. You assumed Trayvon Martin's parents were going to have "2 for 1 Hoodie Sales" based on nothing. You were against a community center being built because it was Muslim based. And you're a birther against a man who has provided more evidence of his birth than any other president in history.
You. Are. A. Racist.
And, much to your dismay I'm sure... it turned out they were right. The bombers were indeed white. I guess since you're also white, that now you'll have to sit at the back of buses, right? And now you can't build a church where you want to, right? No? Well then do shut up, you delicate oppressed minority you.
Lindaman also says: "Oh, and by the way, if the Boston Marathon bomber(s) are reading this, know this. It will take a hell of a lot more than bombs to knock America down. Remember the Iraq War? Ask Saddam Hussein how that turned out..."
Ummm... Iraq didn't bomb us. The excuse of why we went to war with Iraq was because of WMD's... which Iraq didn't have. So, that war was useless. And it was an Iraqi translator that found Saddam. So why are you bringing that up?
Wouldn't 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden make more sense to use as an example? That was a terrorist attack and American Soldiers stopped him.
Oh, I see... you used Iraq because 9/11 was under Bush's watch, and it was Obama that stopped Osama Bin Laden.
"I'm Thomas Lindaman, and you're damn right I approve this message."
And you're the only one. lol
When you hillbillies stop doing bullshit like this, then you can whine.
Lindaman also posted this:
In response to the fact that the bombers also used guns, Lindaman replied: "And they did so...without being licensed. In other words, they circumvented the system in a state with strict gun laws."
Here we go again with the bizarre right-wing argument that there shouldn't be stricter gun control laws, because the current gun control laws aren't strict enough. lol
Three people died because of the bombs. How many people do you think would have been killed if both of the men had AR-15s and shot them into the crowds? No answer? That's what I thought.
The right-wing argument is that an assault weapons ban won't stop every single instance of gun violence, cure cancer and create a lasting peace in the Middle East. And since it won't, we should do nothing at all instead.
The whole "only criminals will have guns" argument is retarded. In 2013 alone, the USA has had over TWENTY FOUR school shootings, resulting in seventeen dead and twenty four wounded. In 2013 in Australia, the UK, Japan, France, Germany, Austria, Italy... all countries with strict gun control laws... the number of school shootings has been: NONE.
Don't speeders see the sign says 25 MPH in that school zone? Yet they still go 35! So why have speed limits in school zones at all? In fact, all laws and regulations are a waste of time and money as criminals break such laws and regulations.
Lindaman: "When the bombings happened, Wolf Blitzer (CNN) speculated it was white conservatives because the bombing occurred on Tax Day and Patriot Day. Chris Matthews (MSNBC) made the same insinuation.Good Morning America (ABC) featured a representative of the Southern Poverty Law Center who insinuated the bombing was from a right wing group because of recent history.
Wow. Three out of five..."
The Southern Poverty Law Center said that April is important for people on the extreme right in the United States. And they are correct. Timothy McVeigh and David Koresh both made their attacks in April. So?
Chris Matthews' commented that domestic terrorists tend to be on the far right. That's also correct. So?
The Blaze had no problems lying about Saudis being involved. Where's your complaining?
Alex Jones claimed it was a false flag operation, for Christ's sake! Where's your complaining?
Should we trust "alternative media"? Remember Salah "Bag Man" Barhoun? Didn't see you complaining there. Oh, that's right... because Barhoun wasn't white.
“It is a state holiday in Massachusetts today called Patriots’ Day. And who knows if that had anything at all to do with these explosions.” —Wolf Blitzer, CNN
So how is that blaming the Tea Party? Speculating that a terrorist would pick a patriotic holiday for an attack would apply to a terrorist whether he was brown or white or black. So what's your point?
What we have here are Teatards unintentionally revealing their own fearful psychology. Blitzer never said "Tea Party." But that's what the wingnuts heard, most likely because Waco and OKC also happened on Patriots' Day, which has become synonymous with right-wing terrorism here in the U.S. The Teatards know it.
Lindaman:"But once again, the media prefer to paint people like me as potential terrorists while giving real criminals a pass. (Can you say "Dr. Kermit Gosnell"?)"
You mean that "local" news story that the "little" network called ABC reported on?
I heard about Gosnell on NPR before I saw any mention of it on Fox.
The media was a little late to this, but that's because white people didn't care enough to be outraged by the murder of non-white babies, and alert them.
Deregulation always brings out the best in a business!
More Republicans Abortion Policies = More people like Gosnell.
If you want to have more Gosnells rather than fewer, keep trying to repeal Roe v. Wade.
You're not interested in quality of life at any rate. You just don't want to think about a world where babies are not born happy, healthy, and what happens to them AFTER they pop out.
Got it?
But back to the bombers:
I knew the bombers were not Teabaggers, because the bombs actually worked.
I knew the bombers weren't Al Qaeda, because the bombs didn't work well enough.
I, like most people, figured the bombers were white people that were not Al Qaeda, but some independent group that were more sophisticated than Teabagger rednecks.
And we were right.
3. They totally implied it's man-made!
Lindman posted this link:
http://twitchy.com/2013/04/29/were-screwed-cong-dems-fear-that-climate-change-will-drive-women-to-prostitution/
Then Lindaman says "I'll take "Bizarre Arguments to Stop Global Warming" for $200, Alex..."
Another white male right-winger is now an expert on poor minority problems.
You seem to ignore that climate change does have an effect on the economy.
When you have an economy as well as an ecosystem that are already stretched to their maximum, having rising waters harm that ecosystem are also going to harm that economy. And with a bad economy, there will be more poverty, and poverty does lead to increases in prostitution.
A large reduction in income from might drive some women into prostitution (we know women have gone into prostitution due to poverty); a change in climate will affect agriculture.
Climate change destroys the agricultural base, real poverty rates raise and the crime and prostitution rate along with it.
And in areas where there have been large percentages of minorities forced into prostitution because of dire poverty, it is an issue.
Poverty leads to prostitution. Climate change does and will affect agriculture and thus increases poverty.
The logic is there, it is consistent and the reality that there are other issues contributing to the problem does not negate the changes global warming can bring about in society.
Plus, the resolution says nothing about Global Warming being man-made, nor does it try to stop it.
Lindaman says it's a "bizarre argument", but he's not showing why. What else is new?
If you want a bizarre argument, how about Conservatives stating that abortion causes climate change?
4. Republicans Hate Babies
Lindaman retweeted this from nutjob Steve Deace:
"Seen on Twitter today: Does everybody remember that Wendy Davis and Barack Obama would've been fine with killing the unborn royal baby as recently as this morning."
When Prince George was born in the UK, the special suite, team of doctors, and private room cost approximately $15,000 dollars.
The average birth in the U.S. is billed at $30,000.
Chew on that, right-wing motherfuckers.
Lindaman then posts this bullshit comic:
President Obama has expressed neither the desire, nor does he possess the power, to ban guns.
97% of Planned Parenthood is family planning which includes education so to help AVOID the prospect of future abortions.
Federal spending towards abortions via Medicaid and elsewhere is expressly forbidden by law and has been for DECADES excepting circumstances involving rape, incest or endangerment to the life of the mother.
Oh, and zygotes aren't babies, you ignorant retards.
Republicans murder ACTUAL children every day, with relish:
1. It is far more likely that a firearm will be used to kill an innocent child, than to stop an intruder or defend against an attacker. Guns kill pregnant women, they kill newborns, babies, toddlers, school children, Junior High and High School Children. They kill via suicide, homicide and accidental death. Rarely are guns used to kill the guilty.
2. Your right-wing useless wars murdered millions of INFANTS.
3. Right-wingers fighting against adequate healthcare for women have caused countless miscarriages.
4. Right-wingers fighting against measures to protect women from violence have lead to miscarriages, infant deaths, and the deaths of pregnant women.
5. Right-wingers fighting against regulations in pollution in water, food, and the air have lead to the miscarriages and the deaths of infants.
6. Right-wingers fighting against any and all supplemental nutrition have lead to miscarriages, infant deaths, and stillbirths.
7. Right-wingers fighting against socio-economic factors for women have lead to miscarriages, infant deaths, and stillbirths.
So don't pretend you give a shit about "teh babbies." You don't.
You right-wingers hate babies so much, you may as well jack off on a baby's face then slowly beat it to death with a brick while laughing about it.
5. The Pressure Cooker "Joke"
Lindaman posted this link:
http://twitchy.com/2013/04/24/piers-morgan-scolds-tenn-sen-stacey-campfield-for-pressure-cooker-control-joke/
Then Lindaman says: "See, Piers, there's this little thing in America we call 'sarcasm.' Senator Campfield's joke was a sarcastic jab at what you've advanced on your show after just about every shooting... You're welcome."
What more would one expect from a classy guy like Campfield, who compares being gay to shooting up heroin?
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/05/tennessee-republican-compares-homosexuality-to-shooting-heroin/
Campfield is also the same douchenozzle that wanted to punish poor school kids by effectively taking food out of their mouths.
Gun nuts actually take that "we can't have gun control because other things kill people too" argument seriously. They legitimately believe there is no reason to consider guns any differently from any other object, and there is no reason to even track or acknowledge crimes done with guns.
Why? Because it's a quick and easy "out" to ignore the conversation. It's an attempt to change the argument, because they're not sure they can "win" the current one. It's a superficial misdirection that will work on those who don't actually think about it.
Using a pressure cooker as a bomb: not used as intended.
Using an assault rifle to kill people: used exactly as intended.
Ironically, pressure cookers have more safety features than guns. lol
If you gun nuts and defenders of said gun nuts were consistent at all, you would say that it is your god-given right to make pressure cooker bombs because they're necessary to defend against a tyrannical government. And, you would be arguing to repeal the laws making the manufacture and possession of IEDs illegal. After all, "the bomb didn't kill those people, a crazy nutjob did! Don't blame the innocent bomb!"
Oh, wait... making that argument would make you sound even more crazy. I guess you gotta draw the line somewhere in order to downplay your fucking insanity. Good thing your favorite hobby doesn't involve stockpiling pressure cooker bombs, or you'd be going nuts right now.
The fact that nutjobs like Lindaman are defending this "pressure cooker control" nonsense shows what a hive-mind they have become. They've really surrendered their ability to apply critical thinking to their own paranoid, false notions. Keep towing the line for your corporate lobbyist NRA overlords, morons. I just hope you someday wake up and realize that you've been duped into supporting a hugely profitable political/industrial machine that has gotten so good, that it has actually convinced its very VERY gullible members to buy huge amounts of guns, ammo, and accessories in response to the brutal SHOOTING of elementary school CHILDREN.
Stay classy, Republicans. And stay classy, Independents (tm) that pretend to not be Republicans, that defend Republicans like that.
Go on, keep saying that regulating guns in response to gun violence is the exact same thing as regulating pressure cookers in response to the Boston bombings. Run with that. Always say that, Republicans. People will respect you. Seriously, keep repeating it. Guns are less dangerous than pressure cookers. Keep saying it. Please.
6. Oh no! They can send mail!
http://twitchy.com/2013/04/22/are-dems-trying-to-score-email-addresses-by-capitalizing-on-boston-bombing/
Lindaman: "If this is some overblown piece designed to make Democrats look bad, I reject it without reservation. If it's true, however, people on both sides of the political spectrum need to be speaking out against it."
They set up a site to make it easy to send thanks to the First Responders, and this is bad? Sheesh.
Ed Schultz criticized Teabaggers because they were POSTING HOME ADDRESSES and you acted like Ed Schultz was the bad guy!
So please don't pretend you're being unbiased. You're not.
7. Yep, they should let them!
Lindaman posted this picture:
When the USA cares about its own citizens the way England and Canada does, that's when the USA doesn't have to listen to their facts.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/01/new-health-rankings-of-17-nations-us-is-dead-last/267045/
http://www.americashealthrankings.org/Rankings/InternationalComparisons
But please, keep plugging up your ears. That's the right-wing solution to most problems, after all.
8. The OWS flailing from the right continues!
Lindaman posted this link:
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/10/06/can-occupy-wall-street-spark-a-revolution
And Lindaman says: "Remember when the media called Occupy/Astroturf Wall Street "terrorists" for wanting to change the government? Neither do I."
Here's an example found after an entire three seconds of research:
Bill O’Reilly: “But what I’m trying to say is not just about me, this Occupy Wall Street movement is now very coordinated and they are terrorists. They are trying to create trouble, that’s what terrorists do.”
You see, Lindman, unlike the Teabaggers, OWS aren't seditionists, since they never wanted to "overthrow the government". That's something you guys love to brag about doing (but will never follow through). Right-wingers tried to shut down the entire government to prevent it from paying debt, so that's sedition. Teabaggers want the Civil War to come back, and it was sedition then and now.
Then Lindman ignorantly posted this fake picture:
"Frank O'Rourke: The photo labeled "Occupy Rally" isn't even in the USA."
"Thomas Lindaman: I thought Astroturf...I mean "Occupy" Wall Street was global..."
Notice how Lindaman ducked Frank's point, that the photo WAS NOT Occupy Wall Street.
Still bitter because the Teabaggers are laughed at by THE ENTIRE PLANET and can't expand?
As for the actual protests from Occupy Wall Street, there's been far worse disruption at sporting events and Black Friday events, for Christ's sake!
OMG Look at all these white terrorists!
http://www.craveonline.com/sports/articles/543261-street-riots-erupt-following-2013-u-s-open
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1514966-super-bowl-2013-baltimore-police-responds-to-riots-following-ravens-victory
http://www.oddee.com/item_98645.aspx
Lindaman's just mad because the Teabaggers have been overwhelming proven beyond ALL doubt that they were astroturfed due to Freedomworks/Dick Armey, while Lindaman's desperate attempts to paint OWS as astroturfed by Soros through the Tides Foundation failed miserably on every single level. lol
OWS has paid off over $15 million in other people's medical debt. This is recent. You Teabaggers, on the other hand, are nothing but selfish gutless assholes.
When an Occupier flies a plane into an IRS tax office and others like him cheer him as a hero, then you can feebly attempt to paint OWS as worse than you people. Got it?
So again, get back to us when you actually know what you're talking about.
